Please note that Fauquier ENT provides the following info as a service.
Dr. Chang performs only nasal fracture repairs while Dr. Redmon performs additional fracture repairs EXCEPT for mandibular fractures.
Broken bones are scary, but broken bones of the face has a particularly unique psychological impact due to the fact that, well. it is the "face". It is what people look at. It is where you breath, see, talk, and eat from. As such, patients who have suffered a facial fracture are understandably concerned about what should be done.
Not All Facial Fractures Require Repair!
Just because something is broken does not mean surgery is required. The key elements that lead towards a decision for surgery are the following (not all-inclusive, but general pointers):
- Any functional deficit including inability to open and close the jaw.
- Change in your occlusion (the way your teeth come together).
- Double vision (blurry vision does not count).
- Cosmetic deformity (asymmetry) due to facial fracture (bruising and swelling does not count).
- Change in your ability to breath.
As a general rule, if the fracture does not affect form (facial symmetry) and function (see, breath, eat), than no surgery is required.
The reason why all broken legs need to be fixed is because it always affects function (walking).
The nice thing about facial fractures is that the skull acts like a natural cast preventing motion of the fracture pieces allowing for healing to occur. Other than the jaw, there are no other moving parts. which is probably why all jaw fractures require surgical repair (more on that below ).
Facial Fracture Management
If a facial fracture is suspected, the best first thing to do is to ice it like crazy (20 min on, 20 min off in cycles throughout the day while awake), keep the head elevated (even when sleeping), and take motrin for any pain/discomfort.
These measures minimize and resolve any swelling and bruising as quickly as possible. If a broken nose is suspected, make an appointment with a plastic surgeon or ENT within 1-2 days. If there is concern for other facial fractures beyond a broken nose, go to the ER and make sure they get a CT of the maxillofacial (no contrast). Of note, a CT scan of the head is NOT the correct study which looks more at the brain rather than the face. Why not an x-ray? A CT scan, unlike an X-ray, provides a 3-dimensional picture of the fracture which is very important when assessing whether surgery is required and essential if surgical repair is pursued.
On the CT scan, beyond exam findings regarding form and function, there are two basic findings that is specifically looked for when evaluating whether surgical repair is needed or not:
Displacement is how far off alignment is the fracture. Ideally, if the fracture is "minimally" or "non" displaced, that's a good sign that suggests no need for fracture repair.
Displacement information in combination with the location of the fracture provides the rest of the information required when deciding whether surgery is needed or not.
Let's now go over fracture location considerations and repair methods. To skip to a specific fracture, see table.
The only reason to see a physician immediately or go to the ER after an injury to the nose is to assess whether a septal hematoma has formed. The septum is a wall that divides the right nasal cavity from the left. If a hematoma has developed (which is VERY rare), it needs to be drained in an approach similar to doing a deviated septum repair .
Regarding the "broken" nose itself.
It is my own personal opinion that getting an X-ray to look for an isolated broken nose is a waste of time and money. Perhaps the ONLY time I would think about getting it is for legal reasons (the victim plans to sue the assailant if applicable).
However, my standard spiel is one only does something about a nasal fracture (surgically) if there is a problem with:
Otherwise, you do nothing. even if it is clearly broken on X-ray (if one was obtained). If the answer is affirmative to one or both of the above, than you fix it. Therefore, why bother with the X-ray if it doesn't change management?
Keep in mind that the nasal bone is located on the top half of the nose. The bottom half of the nose is made of cartilage and if this is where the deformity is located, a nosejob may be required to correct rather than a nasal fracture repair.
If surgery is not required and the patient actively plays in a sport and wishes to continue playing, some type of protection is required as the nose is "broken" after all. Definitely wear a facemask if applicable (ie, ice hockey, football). If the sport does not use any type of headgear (ie, soccer, basketball, etc), than purchasing headgear specifically to protect the nose is highly recommended.
If surgery is required, the fractured pieces of bone are physically moved back in alignment using finger manipulation as well as instruments through the nostril. No incisions are required. A cast may be placed over the nose and needs to be kept in place for 2-3 weeks. Not uncommonly, nasal packing may be inserted into the nose to prevent the broken nasal fragments from falling back into the nasal cavity.
With an extensive nasal fracture, a nosejob rhinoplasty may be required beyond just a simple closed reduction. Here's a video demonstrating a nasal hump removal.
Orbital Fracture (Fractures Around the Eye)
These fractures involve the bone(s) that enclose the eye. It includes not just the rim that you can feel around the eye, but also the bone that holds the eye in place within the skull. The picture depicts the most common areas (purple) where orbital fractures are seen.
As with any facial fracture, an assessment of form and function needs to be made when deciding whether surgical repair is required or not.
Blurry vision is potentially indicative of damage to the eye itself sustained from the trauma. In this situation, ophthalmology evaluation is necessary sooner rather than later.
However, regardless whether blurry or double vision is present or not, it is important to see an ophthalmologist to ensure no hidden problems that may cause problems in the future (ie, traumatic glaucoma, optic neuritis, retinal detachment, etc).
If surgery is pursued, repair requires incisions to the face. Such incisions are demarcated in the image to the left. Red lines are incisions on the skin. Blue lines are special incisions that are hidden from view. Some or all these incisions may be required to completely repair orbital fractures.
Depending on the location of the fracture, endoscopy through the nose or from an incision under the upper lip may be performed to assist in the repair.
Maxillary Sinus Fractures (Not Cheekbone Fractures)
These fractures are demarcated in purple to the right. The bone in this region is exceedingly thin and it does not take much force to cause it to break. And when it breaks, it may do so like an eggshell because of how thin it is. This fracture should not be confused with a cheekbone fracture which is discussed below.
It is quite rare that these fractures require surgical repair unless the fracture is massive in size. Even than, it is still rare to correct.
If repair is performed, it usually is due to nerve compression which may cause some pain or numbness to the cheek region. If sensation is present though decreased, the nerve is intact and repair is not absolutely necessary. The incision to approach these fractures is under the upper lip in the mouth.
The fracture pieces are typically just moved into normal position and than left alone. Plates or screws are not used to stabilize the bone given how thin it is. Trying to place a screw would be trying to insert a screw into an eggshell without breaking it (you just end up breaking it even more).
Zygomatic Fracture (Left)
This fracture (shaded in purple) is located right in front of the ear (behind the cheekbone) and is next to the joint of the jawbone which allows one to open and close the mouth. As such, fractures of the zygoma (shown by red line) typically requires repair as it does impair chewing (affect function) and worst case, prevents mouth closure.
The incision (green line) to correct this fracture is located above the ear within the hair. A blunt instrument (kind of looks like a butter knife) is threaded through this incision down the the fracture and pushed into alignment. A brace of some kind may be placed to hold the fracture segment in place. Rarely, a metal plate may be screwed into the bone to hold it even more securely.
Patients may suffer long-term TMJ after this type of fracture and as such, precautions should be taken after surgery in order to minimize this issue.
Tripod Fracture (Right)
Tripod fracture in its essence is a cheekbone fracture. It is a combination of zygomatic fracture and orbital fracture (red lines) resulting in a free-floating cheekbone (denoted by purple area).
This type of fracture almost always requires repair as it affects both form and/or function.
Given both zygomatic and orbital components, multiple incisions are required for correction, standard ones being shown in green, but others may be required depending on fracture location. Small plates with screws are used to stabilize this type of fracture.
Mandible Fracture (Left)
These fractures are perhaps one of the most common fractures seen after a fight. It's also why martial artists clench their teeth when fighting as such fractures occur when the mouth is open when hit. Though mandible fractures can occur anywhere shaded purple, the most common locations where fractures are seen are shown by the red lines.
Clearly, function is affected as it will hinder a person's ability to chew food.
It's also one of the most uncomfortable facial fracture surgeries to recover from as often, the mouth needs to be wired shut as shown in the picture (mandibular-maxillary fixation). Why? It's so the upper jaw can act as a "cast" to allow for bone healing to occur. The reason this is important is so the bones heal in such way that the teeth comes together as normally as possible. Ideally, it will come together in exactly the same way as it did before the fracture occurred.
Incisions used to fix this type of fracture are all made under the lower lip inside the mouth. Plates with screws are often used for long-term stability. Given the nature of the fracture, teeth issues due to dental root damage as well as lower face numbness is not uncommon and potentially permanent.
LeFort fractures are probably the most severe fractures an individual can sustain to the face and typically occurs in car accidents when the patient was not wearing a seatbelt. There are three classes of LeFort fractures in order of increasing severity shown below. The classic sign that a LeFort fracture has occurred is when the the upper jaw (area shaded in by purple) can be moved freely from the rest of the face (floating upper jaw). These are modified images reproduced from Wikipedia .
Most patients present with a history of blunt orbital trauma. Penetrating trauma is less common.
Currently, the pathogenesis of orbital blow-out fractures follows 2 lines of reasoning. The hydraulic theory advocates that increased intraorbital pressure causes a decompressing fracture into an adjacent sinus. The Buckling theory contends that the posterior transmission of a direct orbital rim force causes a buckling and resultant fracture of the orbital wall. Both mechanisms may be involved to various degrees to produce orbital blow-out fractures. Orbital tissue (fat, fibrous septa, extraocular muscle) may be involved with the fracture site, resulting in ocular motility disturbance, while volume augmentation leads to globe malpositioning.
In classic blow-out floor fractures, the lateral extent is generally limited by the infraorbital neurovascular structures, and the medial extent is limited by the maxilloethmoidal strut of stronger bone. Blow-out fractures of the medial wall are limited by the stronger bone of the frontoethmoidal suture in the superior direction and by the maxilloethmoidal strut in the inferior direction. The medial wall is also intermittently supported by the bony septa between the ethmoidal air cells. In a combined fracture of the floor and medial wall, the maxilloethmoidal bony strut is also fractured.
Blow-out fractures that are limited medially to the infraorbital nerve are more common than those that extend laterally to it, resulting usually from high-velocity trauma. Both in adults and children, the medial and inferior orbital walls are the most vulnerable to fracture owing to their thin bony structure.
A retrospective study by Kim et al indicated that in pure orbital blow-out fractures, delayed orbital tissue atrophy resulting from soft tissue injury greatly contributes to the development of late enophthalmos. (Unlike other studies, however, this report did not find that bony defect size or the volume of displaced soft tissue were significantly related to late enophthalmos.) [4 ]
Because of progressive calcification, the bones of adults lack the elasticity found in those of children. [5 ] Hence, the greenstick fracture is a pediatric response to external deforming forces. The ophthalmic equivalent of the greenstick fracture is the trapdoor variant of the blow-out fracture. Here, intra-orbital soft tissue (fat and muscle) may become entrapped within the fracture as the elastic bones snap back into place, resulting in potentially severe restrictive external ophthalmoplegia; this clinical scenario is further complicated by the relative lack of external periocular signs of trauma in many pediatric cases, known as the white-eyed blow-out fracture (WEBOF). [6 ]
A ZMC fracture is frequently associated with a direct blow to the malar eminence. Classic tetrapod fractures involve injury to each of the following supporting structures of the ZMC:
Superiorly, in the regions of the frontozygomatic suture
Laterally, the zygomaticotemporal suture
Medially, the ZMC suture
Within the lateral orbital wall, the zygomaticosphenoidal suture
Once these buttresses are disrupted, the force of the external injury and the pull of the masseter muscle may cause posterior and inferior rotation of the zygoma. This displacement is evident by the palpable step-off of the orbital rim and zygomatic arch. The zygoma may be comminuted, especially near the ZMC and the zygomaticotemporal sutures.
The frontozygomatic suture is the strongest of the 4 zygomatic buttresses, and consequently, it is usually not comminuted. Displacement of the body of the zygoma is necessarily associated with a fracture of the lateral orbital floor and lateral orbital rim. Orbital-rim fractures are generally the result of a direct blow. Orbital-roof fractures are usually the result of high-energy injuries. They may be anteriorly continuous with an injury to the supraorbital rim or frontal sinus, or they may extend posteriorly to the superior orbital fissure. Linear undisplaced, blow-out, and blow-in fractures have been described. Always consider associated brain parenchymal and dural injuries.Presentation
Most patients present with a history of blunt orbital trauma. Initial treatment in patients with facial injuries should be aimed at airway security, hemodynamic stability, and cervical-spine integrity. Head injuries must be ruled out. The patient should be evaluated for additional soft-tissue and bony injuries of the head and neck.
A 10-year, retrospective study by Büttner et al indicated that the presence of a black eye in patients with minor head injuries predicts the existence of orbital fracture. The investigators found that out of 1676 patients with minor head trauma who presented with one or two black eyes, computed tomography (CT) scanning showed a maxillofacial skeletal fracture in 1144 (68.3%) of them. The report therefore recommended that all minor head trauma patients presenting with a black eye undergo CT scanning. [7 ]
Injury to the globe has been reported in as many as 30% of orbital fractures, stressing the importance of an ocular examination. Assessment of ocular function is important on presentation, during surgery, and after surgery. Remember that the function of the orbit is to protect the globe and support a functioning binocular visual system. The importance of recording visual acuity cannot be overemphasized. [8 ] Check the patient's best-corrected vision, considering the refractive error and degree of presbyopia (if a near chart is used). Spectacles are frequently broken or lost during the traumatic event. Record the patient's unaided and pinhole vision.
Pupil function is important to assess and is abnormal in traumatic optic neuropathy (with a relative afferent pupil defect), as well as in cases of third nerve/ciliary ganglion injury and traumatic mydriasis. Referral to an ophthalmologist is advised for a more thorough assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic ocular anatomy and function. This assessment includes a dilated fundal examination with the use of a slitlamp and ophthalmoscope.
In most cases of orbital fracture, significant periocular ecchymosis and edema are evident. The position of the globe should be assessed. However, enophthalmos is rarely evident in the first days after injury because of edema of the orbital tissues. Frequently, a degree of proptosis is evident early. Significant hypoglobus may be seen with severe floor disruption and also with a subperiosteal hematoma of the roof.
Diplopia with inferior rectus muscle dysfunction is common, with muscle restriction associated with perimuscular tissue entrapment at the fracture. This is commonly a nonconcomitant vertical diplopia. Extraocular muscle edema, hemorrhage, and nerve neurapraxia may also cause diplopia .
A study by Boffano et al indicated that the characteristics of diplopia vary according to the type of orbital wall fracture. The report, in which just over 50% of 447 patients with pure blow-out fractures presented with evidence of diplopia, found statistically significant associations between orbital floor fractures and diplopia on eye elevation, and between medial wall fractures and horizontal diplopia. The investigators suggested, therefore, that the form of diplopia that a patient demonstrates may offer clues to the type of orbital fracture present. [9 ]
Forced duction tests, force generation tests, and coronal CT scanning aid in the clinical assessment of orbital fracture. Vertical ocular motility disturbance suggests a fracture of the orbital floor. Traumatic rupture of an extraocular muscle has been reported and should be evident on the CT scan. Muscle entrapment is reported to be more likely with small fractures, which have less enophthalmos. In large fractures, enophthalmos is more likely and entrapment is less likely.
Infraorbital nerve (with its anterior superior alveolar branch) hypesthesia is reported in as many as 60% of orbital floor blow-out fractures and in 71% of inferior orbital rim fractures. Disruption of the mucosal integrity of the maxillary or ethmoidal sinus may result in subcutaneous or intraorbital emphysema. A history of sudden orbital pressure and crepitus with postinjury nose blowing is relatively frequent.
Medial-wall fractures may be the result of direct naso-orbital trauma or may be a blow-out type of fracture. The medial-wall fracture may be isolated, but frequently, it is part of a medial wall-floor fracture complex with disruption of the maxilloethmoidal strut. Loss of medial wall stability is associated with enophthalmos and horizontal muscle imbalance (with medial rectus herniation into the ethmoid sinus). Severe epistaxis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, and lacrimal drainage problems have been reported. Medial-wall fracture is seen in the image below.
Medial-wall fracture with significant herniation of the orbital contents into the ethmoid sinus. Horizontal diplopia was evident.
A subgroup of orbital floor fractures with a longitudinal medially based hinged fracture results in a trapdoor effect with firm soft-tissue entrapment. Radiologically, these fractures may not seem impressive, with minimal bone displacement and minimal soft-tissue herniation. This pattern of injury is particularly frequent in the pediatric age group. Because of the greater elasticity of the orbital bones in children, their potential for these trapdoor fractures is greater. Trapdoor fracture is seen in the image below.
Orbital floor fracture with significant soft-tissue entrapment, a so-called trapdoor fracture. Note the relatively small amount of herniated tissue and the air-fluid level in the maxillary sinus. This patient had a significant vertical ocular motility disturbance.
One must remember that because of the subtle external and radiologic signs, WEBOF, often seen in pediatric group (as described above), is easily overlooked in a busy emergency department. [10 ] The diagnosis may be delayed further by symptoms of nausea and vomiting, which often lead to radiologic investigation of the head, rather than the orbit, in search of intracranial injury.
To diagnose WEBOF in the emergency department, Lane et al (2007) recommend the following for all children who present with nausea and vomiting following orbital trauma: [11 ]
These patients must be specifically asked about the presence and pattern of diplopia (horizontal, vertical).
These patients must undergo an extraocular motility examination.
If extraocular motility dysfunction is noted (or cannot be documented to be normal), patients must undergo dedicated orbital CT scanning with axial and coronal views with bone and soft tissue windows, along with CNS imaging, as indicated clinically.
Attempted ocular movements in these patients may generate significant pain and intense parasympathetic autonomic features of nausea, vomiting, and bradycardia. Such fractures warrant early intervention, not only to alleviate the patient's symptoms but also to prevent compromise of the vascular supply to the entrapped tissue and an ischemic contracture of the entrapped tissue.
Orbital-roof fractures are particularly important because of their association with intracranial injury. Dural tears are associated with CSF leakage and pneumocephalus. Subperiosteal hematoma may cause significant hypoglobus. Ptosis and vertical ocular motility disturbance are seen with injury to the levator-superior rectus muscle complex.
Fractures of the orbital apex are rarely isolated and occur in association with or as an extension of fractures of the facial and orbital skeleton or base of skull. The anatomy of the orbital apex is significant for the complex association between bony, neural, and vascular elements, and morbidity is due to injury to these structures. Injury to the optic nerve leads to visual loss, most commonly resulting from an indirect posterior traumatic optic neuropathy .
Injuries to cranial nerves III, IV, and VI manifest as extraocular muscle nerve palsy with manifest diplopia. Injury to cranial nerve V appears as sensory disturbance to areas supplied by branches of the trigeminal nerve. However, significant injury to the neurovascular structures of the orbital apex may be present without a fracture. Optic canal fractures are seen in about 50% of patients with posterior optic neuropathy due to trauma. Sensation of the superior orbital rim is supplied by the branches of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve, which remains uninjured in fractures of the orbital floor. Hypesthesia of the ipsilateral upper central incisor suggests a fracture of the orbital floor.
Lateral-wall fractures are generally part of a ZMC fracture. Clinical features include visible malar flattening, lateral canthal dystopia, globe displacement with enophthalmos, diplopia with muscle imbalance, and a palpable step at the orbital rim in the regions of the ZMC or frontozygomatic suture. Problems with mastication arise, especially with displaced zygomatic arch fracture impingement on the coronoid process of the mandible. Lateral-wall fracture is seen in the image below.
This lateral-wall fracture is part of a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture that was classified as a tripod fracture.
NOE fractures generally occur with a traumatic telecanthus (due to lateral displacement of the medial canthal tendon/bony central segment complex) and abnormal projection of the nasal bridge. The lamina papyracea is commonly comminuted in these fractures. Associated injuries to the frontal sinus, nasofrontal duct, and cribriform plate are common.
The 3 most important associated orbital injuries include the following:
Traumatic retrobulbar hemorrhage and the development of an orbital compartment syndrome
Traumatic optic neuropathy
Coexistent ocular injury (including a globe rupture)
Differential diagnoses include orbital edema and hemorrhage without orbital fracture and cranial nerve palsies.
The aim of orbital reconstruction is to achieve normal bony projection, to reposition the globe, to release any entrapped orbital soft tissue, and to reconstitute normal orbital volume.
The management of orbital fractures involves clinical evaluation of the patient; appropriate imaging; and an evaluation of whether, when, and how to repair the fractures.
Not all patients with isolated orbital blow-out fractures require surgical intervention. Two variables dictate whether repair should be undertaken: ocular motility and orbital volume. The decision for intervention should be made with an understanding of the anticipated natural history over time.
Indications are as follows:
Large orbital-floor fractures, ie, those with radiologic evidence of significant displacement or comminution of more than 50% of the orbital floor, with prolapse of orbital soft tissue, that are likely to lead to significant enophthalmos (usually reported as >2 mm) (However, a study by Vicinanzo et al suggested that in cases of orbital-floor fracture, clinical findings, rather than computed tomography [CT] scan assessments of fracture size, should be used to determine the need for surgery, since the investigation, which involved 23 patients, showed only moderate agreement between neuroradiologists in their evaluation of the extent of floor fractures. [12 ] )
Persistent diplopia accompanied by positive forced duction results and radiologic evidence of perimuscular tissue entrapment (Patients with diplopia within 30° of the primary position are likely to have persistent diplopia; therefore, surgical intervention is warranted.)
A decision against early intervention should be balanced against an appreciation of the difficulties encountered when late reconstructive surgery for diplopia or enophthalmos is required.
The coexistence of a floor and medial-wall fracture, especially with disruption of the maxilloethmoidal strut, frequently requires repair in view of the orbital volume expansion. However, both isolated floor and isolated medial-wall fractures may fulfill the motility- and volume-based criteria for surgery. Several groups have attempted to correlate the volume of herniated orbital tissue and the degree of enophthalmos, with results of one study suggesting that a 1-mL increase in orbital volume leads to 0.8 mm of enophthalmos.
Generally, the presence of significant displacement or comminution of the orbital rim requires open reduction and internal fixation. Principles involve preservation of bone fragments and miniplate fixation.
The timing of surgery has also been debated over the years. Except in the circumstance of a trapdoor fracture with the potential for an ischemic contracture of the entrapped tissue, the authors generally allow several days for orbital and eyelid edema to resolve. This delay also allows more accurate assessment of extraocular muscle function. However, the authors try to undertake repair within 2 weeks of the injury and prior to any early fibrosis of entrapped tissue.
The anatomy of the orbit is well described. However, features of relevance are noted here.
The orbits are pyramidal-shaped structures with 4 walls that meet at the orbital apex. The superior orbital fissure, the inferior orbital fissure, and the optic canal are located toward the apex. Each orbital volume is about 30 mL.
The orbital floor is the shortest of all the walls and does not reach the apex. It measures 35 X 40 mm and terminates just before the orbital apex and annulus of Zinn. A 3-mm downward displacement of the entire floor results in an orbital volume that is increased by 1.5 cm 3 (a 5% increase), producing 1-1.5 mm of enophthalmos. The orbital wall is thinnest medial to the infraorbital canal, where it may just be 0.5 mm in thickness and, thus, most vulnerable to fracture.
The floor inclines superiorly at a 30° angle from anterior to posterior and at a 45° angle from lateral to medial. The floor is not uniplanar, but it has post–rim concavity and posterior convexity. This postequatorial convexity must be accurately reconstructed to help prevent postoperative enophthalmos. The inferior orbital fissure defines the posterior limit of the orbital floor. The infraorbital neurovascular bundle crosses the floor and may define the extent of a floor fracture. Perforating vessels are frequently encountered in periosteal elevation of the orbital floor. Cauterization of these vessels prior to cutting is prudent.
The infraorbital nerve exits the foramen of rotundum, traverses the pterygopalatine fossa, and exits through the infraorbital foramen as the infraorbital nerve. The orbital floor is separated into the medial and lateral segments by the infraorbital nerve. The medial segment is larger and more fragile. It is bounded by the infraorbital fissure, the bony canal of the V2, the orbital rim, and the inferior aspect of lamina papyracea. The lateral segment of the orbital floor is generally thicker and stronger than the medial segment and is bounded by the infraorbital fissure, the bony canal of the V2, the orbital rim, and the lateral orbital wall.
In medial-wall dissection, the anterior and posterior ethmoidal vessels are situated just below the level of the frontoethmoidal suture and serve as important landmarks. The anterior ethmoidal foramen is about 24 mm posterior to the anterior lacrimal crest. The posterior ethmoidal foramen is about 12 mm posterior to the anterior ethmoidal foramen. The optic canal opens some 6 mm posterior to the posterior ethmoidal foramen.
Periosteal dissection of the lateral orbital wall usually requires division of the zygomaticotemporal and zygomaticofacial nerves, causing hypesthesia to the lateral orbital rim. The lateral extent of the inferior orbital fissure is 15 mm from the rim.
The superior orbital rim presents the superior orbital notch or foramen, which allows passage of the supraorbital neurovascular bundle. This bundle may be damaged in rim fractures or in surgical approaches to the rim or roof. The orbital roof may be very thin and deficient in places in the aged skull.
All surgical approaches to the floor require knowledge of eyelid anatomy, and the reader is referred to the Medscape Reference article Eyelid Anatomy .
Yan Z, Zhou Z, Song X. Nasal Endoscopy-Assisted Reconstruction of Orbital Floor Blowout Fractures Using Temporal Fascia Grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb 25. [Medline].
Shi W, Jia R, Li Z, He D, Fan X. Combination of transorbital and endoscopic transnasal approaches to repair orbital medial wall and floor fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Jan. 23(1):71-4. [Medline].
Bord SP, Linden J. Trauma to the globe and orbit. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2008 Feb. 26(1):97-123, vi-vii. [Medline].
Kim SM, Jeong YS, Lee IJ, Park MC, Park DH. Prediction of the development of late enophthalmos in pure blowout fractures: delayed orbital tissue atrophy plays a major role. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016 May 13. [Medline].
de Man K, Wijngaarde R, Hes J, de Jong PT. Influence of age on the management of blow-out fractures of the orbital floor. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Dec. 20(6):330-6. [Medline].
Jordan DR, Allen LH, White J, Harvey J, Pashby R, Esmaeli B. Intervention within days for some orbital floor fractures: the white-eyed blowout. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Nov. 14(6):379-90. [Medline].
Büttner M, Schlittler FL, Michel C, et al. Is a black eye a useful sign of facial fractures in patients with minor head injuries? A retrospective analysis in a level I trauma centre over 10 years. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul. 52(6):518-22. [Medline].
Kim YS, Kim JH, Hwang K. The Frequency of Decreased Visual Acuity in Orbital Fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jul. 26 (5):1581-3. [Medline].
Boffano P, Roccia F, Gallesio C, et al. Diplopia and orbital wall fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Mar. 25(2):e183-5. [Medline].
Ilankovan V, Hadley D, Moos K, el Attar A. A comparison of imaging techniques with surgical experience in orbital injuries. A prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1991 Nov. 19(8):348-52. [Medline].
Lane K, Penne RB, Bilyk JR. Evaluation and management of pediatric orbital fractures in a primary care setting. Orbit. 2007 Sep. 26(3):183-91. [Medline].
Vicinanzo MG, McGwin G Jr, Allamneni C, Long JA. Interreader Variability of Computed Tomography for Orbital Floor Fracture. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct 8. 1-4. [Medline].
Kubal WS. Imaging of orbital trauma. Radiographics. 2008 Oct. 28(6):1729-39. [Medline].
Bruneau S, De Haller R, Courvoisier DS, Scolozzi P. Can a Specific Computed Tomography-Based Assessment Predict the Ophthalmological Outcome in Pure Orbital Floor Blowout Fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Nov. 27 (8):2092-2097. [Medline].
Salvin JH. Systematic approach to pediatric ocular trauma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep. 18(5):366-72. [Medline].
Scawn RL, Lim LH, Whipple KM, et al. Outcomes of Orbital Blow-Out Fracture Repair Performed Beyond 6 Weeks After Injury. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Aug 13. [Medline].
Damgaard OE, Larsen CG, Felding UA, Toft PB, von Buchwald C. Surgical Timing of the Orbital "Blowout" Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 May 10. [Medline].
Suzuki M, Nakamura Y, Ozaki S, Yokota M, Murakami S. Repair of Orbital Floor Fracture With Modified Transnasal Endoscopic Approach Through Anterior Space to Nasolacrimal Duct. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jan 18. [Medline].
Lieger O, Schaller B, Kellner F, Messmer-Schai B, Iizuka T. Low-profile titanium mesh in the use of orbital reconstruction: A pilot study. Laryngoscope. 2012 Feb 28. [Medline].
Dal Canto AJ, Linberg JV. Comparison of orbital fracture repair performed within 14 days versus 15 to 29 days after trauma. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec. 24(6):437-43. [Medline].
Burm JS. Internal fixation in trapdoor-type orbital blowout fracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Sep 15. 116(4):962-70. [Medline].
Chang EW, Manolidis S. Orbital floor fracture management. Facial Plast Surg. 2005 Aug. 21(3):207-13. [Medline].
Hinohira Y, Yumoto E, Shimamura I. Endoscopic endonasal reduction of blowout fractures of the orbital floor. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Nov. 133(5):741-7. [Medline].
Kontio R. Treatment of orbital fractures: the case for reconstruction with autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jul. 62(7):863-8. [Medline].
Lee JW. Treatment of enophthalmos using corrective osteotomy with concomitant cartilage-graft implantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Nov 25. [Medline].
Strong EB. Endoscopic repair of orbital blow-out fractures. Facial Plast Surg. 2004 Aug. 20(3):223-30. [Medline].